top of page

Where AI Actually Belongs in Product Strategy

  • Writer: Mimi Ampomah
    Mimi Ampomah
  • 2 days ago
  • 4 min read

Where AI Actually Belongs in Product Strategy



(Hint: not everywhere.)


For the past two years, product leaders have been trapped in a strange executive séance where someone whispers “AI,” the lights flicker, budgets appear, and suddenly every roadmap has a machine-learning-shaped dent in it.


Let’s get one thing straight:


AI is not a strategy. It is a capability.


And when leaders confuse the two, they ship bloated features nobody asked for, burn engineering cycles, and quietly teach customers to ignore anything labeled “AI-powered.”


So where does AI actually belong in product strategy?


Let’s talk about it.



First — Stop Starting With the Technology


Bad product conversations sound like this:


“How can we use AI in our product?”



Great product conversations sound like this:


“Where are our customers struggling in ways that software alone can’t solve efficiently?”


AI should enter the discussion after you identify:


  • High-friction workflows

  • Cognitive overload

  • Decision bottlenecks

  • Pattern-heavy tasks

  • Scale problems humans can’t keep up with



If you start with the tech, you’ll build a demo.


If you start with the problem, you might build a company-defining capability.




The Three Places AI Truly Belongs


1. Where Decisions Need to Happen Faster Than Humans Can Manage


Think about environments drowning in data:


  • Fraud detection

  • Supply chain forecasting

  • Risk modeling

  • Dynamic pricing

  • Operational monitoring



Humans are excellent at judgment.


Humans are terrible at parsing 4.7 million signals in real time.


AI shines when it reduces decision latency — not when it replaces human thinking, but when it clears the cognitive traffic jam.


Strategic test:

👉 Does AI materially improve the speed or quality of a decision?

If not, it’s probably theater.




2. Where Personalization Actually Changes Outcomes


Let’s be honest: swapping a first name into an email stopped being personalization around the same time we stopped using iPods.


Real personalization means the product adapts to the user — sometimes before they even ask.


Strong signals you’re in the right territory:


  • Users have heterogeneous needs

  • Behavior predicts intent

  • Context matters

  • Timing matters



Weak signal:


“Our competitors added AI.” Congratulations. So did everyone else.

The strategic question is not can you personalize.


It’s:


Does personalization meaningfully improve retention, conversion, or lifetime value?


If the answer is fuzzy, your roadmap should be too — fuzzy enough to erase that feature.




3. Where Complexity Is Blocking Customer Momentum


Customers don’t churn because your product lacks features.


They churn because your product feels like doing taxes.


AI earns its seat at the strategy table when it:


  • Summarizes the overwhelming

  • Recommends the next step

  • Automates configuration

  • Translates expertise into guidance



In short:


AI should make your product feel easier than it has any right to be.


Not flashier.

Not trendier.

Easier.


Ease is wildly underrated as a growth lever.



Where AI Definitely Does Not Belong


Let’s save you a few million dollars. AI is usually a mistake when:



It exists purely for marketing optics

Customers can smell “AI-washing” from orbit.



It adds a second workflow instead of removing one

If users must verify, correct, and redo the AI’s work… congratulations, you invented extra labor.



Your data foundation is a mess

Garbage data + AI = faster garbage.


Brutal, but true.



The problem happens too infrequently

If customers encounter the issue twice a year, automation won’t drive behavior change.


Strategy is about leverage. Not novelty.




The Strategic Shift Most Leaders Miss


The biggest mistake companies make is treating AI like a feature rollout.


The winners treat it like a product posture shift.


Instead of asking:

“What AI features should we build?”


They ask:

“What would our product feel like if intelligence were native to every critical moment?”


Notice the difference? One produces widgets. The other reshapes the experience.




AI Should Follow Your Product Principles — Not Rewrite Them


If your product is known for:


  • Trust → prioritize explainability

  • Speed → optimize latency

  • Simplicity → hide the model complexity

  • Control → keep humans in the loop



AI should amplify your identity, not mutate it.


When products suddenly behave unpredictably, customer trust erodes faster than your infrastructure bill grows. And those bills grow. Quickly.


(Your CFO is already sweating.)



A Simple Filter for Your Next Roadmap Debate


Before approving any AI initiative, ask five uncomfortable questions:


  1. What user pain becomes dramatically smaller because of this?

  2. Is this a step-change improvement or a mild convenience?

  3. Does it remove effort — or redistribute it to the customer?

  4. Do we have the data maturity to support it?

  5. Will this still matter in three years, or is it trend-chasing?


If the room goes quiet, that’s useful data.



The Future Isn’t “AI Products.” It’s Products That Feel Effortless.


Five years from now, customers won’t be impressed that your product uses AI.


They’ll expect it — the same way they expect search bars to work and passwords to reset.


AI is rapidly becoming table stakes infrastructure, not a differentiator.


The real competitive advantage will belong to companies that use intelligence to create products that feel:


  • Anticipatory

  • Calm

  • Adaptive

  • Almost unfairly easy


Because the best technology is the kind users barely notice.



Final Thought


AI belongs in product strategy anywhere it shrinks effort, sharpens decisions, or unlocks scale.


Everywhere else?


It’s just expensive decoration.


Build less spectacle.

Build more leverage.


Your customers — and your roadmap — will thank you.

 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
Why Most Roadmaps Fail

Let’s start with a slightly uncomfortable truth: Most roadmaps don’t fail because teams can’t execute. They fail because they were never strategic to begin with. Yes, engineering delays happen. Yes, p

 
 
 
bottom of page